Does Utah Observe the Environment friendly Proximate Causation Rule for Insurance coverage Coverage Interpretation? | Property Insurance coverage Protection Legislation Weblog


Jen Silver owns a roofing enterprise and is a enterprise educator to restoration contractors and roofers. She requested whether or not Utah follows the environment friendly proximate causation rule for insurance coverage coverage interpretation after studying yesterday’s publish, Mathew “One T” Mulholland Does a Nice Job Educating Georgia Public Adjusters on Georgia’s Environment friendly Proximate Trigger Doctrine and How It Applies to the Put on and Tear Exclusion. Silver lives in Utah when not crossing the nation offering academic seminars.

The Utah Supreme Court docket made this ruling relating to the environment friendly proximate trigger take a look at:1

We imagine that the right path to observe is to acknowledge the environment friendly proximate trigger rule solely when the events haven’t chosen freely to contract out of it. Because the Colorado Supreme Court docket said in Kane v. Royal Insurance coverage Co. of America, ‘ ‘[T]he environment friendly proximate trigger’ rule, if it have been adopted by this courtroom, should yield to a well-settled precept of legislation: specifically, that courts is not going to rewrite a contract for the events.’ Sofa’s Cyclopedia of Insurance coverage Legislation is according to this conclusion:

The ideas of causation shouldn’t be so intently utilized as to defeat the intent of the events as manifested within the contract of insurance coverage.

The rule applies in Utah, however policyholders should be involved with anti-concurrent causation language and different causation clauses within the coverage.

For contractors and others wishing to be taught extra about points dealing with insurance coverage restoration contractors, I recommend you watch a presentation she recorded at this hyperlink. She tackles the problems in a really easy method, and these are points talked about by all roofers and restoration contractors coping with insurance coverage corporations.

Thought For The Day

Builders finally be taught that the wall is just not a barrier however a technique to one other room.

—Robert Brault


1 Alf v. State Farm Fireplace & Cas. Co., 850 P.2nd 1272 (Utah 1993).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *